Entrepreneur support organizations
Run the program on a core you own
Run applications, evaluations, cohorts, activities and events in one workspace under your own brand, and stop reconciling a stack of tools by hand.
The program operating core that replaces
A program-management SaaS
01 · Which one are you?
Built for how your program runs
02 · Your first week
Four things you’d use in week one
Program teams usually start with these four. All four work from the same founder record, and nothing is entered twice.
03 · The jobs
What the platform does here
Run every program from one workspace
Applications, evaluations, cohorts, activities and events sit in one workspace your organization owns and controls. Data entered once is available across all of it.
Program teams lose their week to reconciliation: moving the same founder between a form tool, a CRM, a notes platform and a slide deck. A stack can move data around, but it can’t be the source of truth. There’s no single view of who’s on track and who’s at risk. That work never makes the program better, and it grows with every cohort you add.
Advisors who stay, and evidence you can show them
Advisors are matched on stage, sector and the gaps the founder named, with every session, action and outcome logged on the founder record.
Recruiting advisors is hard and managing them is harder. Without structured matching, there’s no way to place the right person. Without session tracking, you can’t tell whether the advice landed or show an advisor anything that would make them stay. Advisor churn costs a program more than it usually admits, because each departure takes relationships and context with it.
Capital outcomes across the cohort
Readiness and raise tracking across the whole cohort is coming soon. It will turn capital outcomes into numbers you can report.
Capital outcomes are the headline every sponsor and funder asks about, and they’re usually the hardest to evidence. The raises happen in conversations the program wasn’t part of, and the amounts arrive by hearsay months later. The number in the report is pieced together from whatever founders happened to mention.
A record that outlives the cohort
Every founder keeps a live profile. Alumni stay reachable and countable long after graduation.
Three months after demo day the program has moved on to the next cohort, and six months later half the alumni have dropped out of view. Three years later one of them has a real outcome, and the program has lost so much continuity it can’t credibly claim attribution. Most programs stop tracking founders once the cohort ends.
Outcomes on one record per founder
Keep a persistent record per founder covering applications, activities and outcomes. Reports for funders come from the same record.
Proving outcomes to secure the next funding cycle is the primary pain of this job, and today it’s done by hand. Someone pulls eighteen data points from a dozen tools the week the sponsor report is due, usually the person who can least afford the week. The data exists, but it’s trapped in tools that won’t share it, so every number has to be checked by hand.
Beneficiary counts that reconcile the first time
Report by grant period, with outcomes logged against the founders who produced them.
Grants are harder to win than they were, slower to land, and are being cut. That makes every reporting cycle consequential, because the report is what protects the next one. Federal and state funders want clean outcomes on their own calendar, and the reporting team stitches them together from separate systems every quarter.